|
Myths
about the Law School Admissions
Process
by
Judge Richard Poland,
Flagler
College
At
the
21st
SAPLA
Conference
hosted
by
Duke
University
School
of
Law,
I
organized
and
moderated
the
panel
entitled "Debunking
Law School Myths." The
panelists were the well-respected
and experienced Deans of Admission
Michelle Rahman of the University
of Richmond, Michael Patrick
of the University of Florida,
and John Benfield of the University
of South Carolina. We discovered
that there are many myths, most
of which have an equal and opposite
counter-myth. The following
is a list of ten myths which
we now declare to be officially
debunked and which I have reduced to writing for posterity:
Myth
# 1: A Law School Admissions
Committee will only look at
your GPA for the last 60 academic
hours. In
fact, the student's entire
collegiate academic record
is fully examined and considered.
Doing better academically as
a junior and senior may give
you material for your personal
statement because you matured
and became focused, but your
cumulative and uniform GPA
is what the committee will
consider.
Myth
# 2: If I attend University
X as an undergraduate, then
I will have a more competitive
chance to gain admission into
University X Law School. Many
students also believe that
their chances are diminished
if they attend University X
as an undergraduate. The truth
is that it does not matter.
Most law schools do not have
the seating capacity to accept
every applicant from its own
institution, even if the Admissions
Committee wanted to do that.
Each applicant is considered
on his or her own merits.
Myth
# 3: If you take the LSAT more
than once, every law school
will average your score. In
fact, many law schools will
look more closely at your second
score. If it is significantly
higher and if there's a reasonable
explanation, the second score
can carry more weight. Again,
you should address the reason
for this higher score in your
personal statement. Nevertheless,
most law schools will average
your LSAT score because LSAC
and ABA data reflects the averaged
score.
Myth
# 4: A "WP" on
your transcript will always
create a negative impression. While
a pattern of WPs scattered
throughout your transcript
might indicate that you are
course shopping for an easy
A, there may be a reasonable
explanation. Four or five WPs
during one semester may indicate
sickness or a serious emergency.
One or two WPS may merely indicate
that the course content was
not what you had expected.
The applicant's personal statement
should state an explanation.
Myth
# 5: It is best not to disclose
a DUI or a misdemeanor on your
application. Answering
all questions truthfully is
the course of action the student
should always pursue. Lying
will create a bigger problem
than the truth. When given
advice to lie on a law school
application, you should consider
seeking advice elsewhere. A
pre-law advisor is always a
good place to begin.
Myth
# 6: There is a magic undergraduate
major that will put me at the
head of the admission committee's
line. While
some majors may have a reputation
of requiring critical thinking
and thoughtful writing, how
can an Admissions Committee
possibly determine whether
one particular major at your
institution is more rigorous
than another major or whether
a particular major at your
institution is more rigorous
than that same major at other
institutions? Take courses
that encourage you to think
and write, knowing that there
is no magic major.
Myth
# 7: Rolling admissions means
apply early and my lesser credentials
will gain me admission. If
you are a presumptive admittee,
you will most likely be admitted
whenever you apply. If you
are not, you will not. If the
law school to which you are
applying has an early admission
policy, then you should apply
early. Remember that applying
early is always preferred over
applying late. Having your
applications mailed by Thanksgiving
is a good rule of thumb.
Myth
# 8: Strong letters of recommendation
from important people will
trump my low grades and poor
LSAT score. While
positive letters of recommendation
are a plus, it is ultimately
your academic record and your
specialness that will gain
a seat for you in next year's
class.
Myth # 9: When law schools
talk about diversity, they are referring only to ethnicity
and race. While
diversity includes race and ethnicity, it is much broader than
that. What else makes someone special? Factors like
age, geographical background, economic background, languages,
and other unique life experiences add to the diversity of a law
school class.
Myth
# 10: Only geniuses should apply. Having
practiced law for 20 years
and presided as a probate judge
for 18, I am living proof that
this is, indeed, a mere myth.
A solid work ethic and superior
people skills are just as important
for a successful career in
law. Also, remember that LSAC statistics indicate that
nearly 70% of all law school applicants are admitted
to at least one ABA accredited law school. Becoming
a lawyer is not an impossible dream reserved for those
geniuses who walk among us.
Back
to the Pre-Law main page
|